🔗 Share this article

Itranspired the manager endured a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System and Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.