🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation is that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.